Project overview
The works Sinking2.5 abstractly conveys the anxiety and turmoil of humans in the 21st century, confronting the AI era. Emerging from the inner ego, the object clashes and grapples with the dimensions of space and time.
director’s biography
With 25 years of experience across diverse creative fields, including music, sound effects, game design, 2D/3D animated films, UI/UX design, VR/AR, interactive and digital media, 3D modeling, matte painting, background design, rendering, texturing, lighting, storyboarding, visual effects, compositing, and music design.
Credits & Specifications
| Joanna&rubens | Director |
| Joanna&rubens | Writer |
| Joanna&rubens | Producer |
| Project Type: | Animation, Documentary, Experimental, Student |
| Genres: | sci_fi, art, abstract |
| Runtime: | 3 minutes |
| Completion Date: | January 1, 2018 |
| Country of Origin: | Taiwan |
| Country of Filming: | Taiwan |
| Language: | English |
| Shooting Format: | Digital |
| Aspect Ratio: | 16:9 |
| Film Color: | Color |
| First-time Filmmaker: | No |
| Student Project: | Yes |
Review
Sinking2.5 effectively conveys people’s discomfort and struggles in the AI-driven twenty-first century. The artwork illustrates the conflict between human identity and the rapidly expanding impact of technology through abstract imagery. It delves into the internal struggle, as if the ego is always attempting to figure out where it fits in a world where computerized systems and computers have created it. The work effectively conveys the conflict between the ego, time, and space, causing the spectator to consider their own uncertainties. Ultimately, Sinking2.5 offers a provocative look at the feelings people experience as artificial intelligence continues to transform our world.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this review are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of any associated organizations or entities. This review is provided for informational and entertainment purposes. While we strive for accuracy and impartiality, the content reflects the personal experiences and perspectives of the reviewer. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and form independent judgments.
